Share Tool

Upping the Ante: The DOL Rule and Risk Management 

Neil Dwane 

Dialed In To Retirement  

Glenn Dial

11/29/2016 

The DOL fiduciary rule's far-sweeping changes have placed risk management front and center for financial advisors. From practice management to portfolio risk, Glenn Dial says the stakes are elevated, even after the election.
New president, same DOL rule for now
Now that Donald Trump has been elected as the next President of the United States, the financial services industry wants to know, among other things, what the incoming administration plans to do with the much-maligned DOL Fiduciary Standard Rule. But given that many financial services companies will already be in the process of implementing the rule, it’s unlikely that many of them will revert back to the old system even if the rule is eventually repealed.

Designed to protect retirement investors, the DOL fiduciary rule stipulates that anyone who advises or makes recommendations to retirement plans, plan participants, or IRA owners, is now considered a fiduciary. At 923 pages long, the rule is expansive and complex, yet if there’s one overarching theme throughout, it's that of risk management.
Even if the DOL rule is repealed, it’s unlikely that many advisors will revert back to the old system
In short, the rule seeks to minimize risk to retirement investors while transferring new fiduciary duties to financial advisors.

Financial advisors are going to have to take a much more comprehensive approach to risk management that starts at the practice level before moving onto client retirement portfolios. This includes a thorough review of advisory operations and determining exactly who in your practice—front as well as back-office—is considered a fiduciary. The review of your business should also encompass all marketing materials—including web content, investor kits and advertising—which have to be scrubbed to make sure they’re DOL rule compliant.

As an alternative, many advisors are considering the Best Interest Contract Exemption (BICE), but this comes with its own issues. The most daunting aspect of BICE, however, is the threat of class-action lawsuits from IRA investors, who can sue advisors if they believe their interests haven't come first. And not only is there a litigation threat, but the burden of proving compliance with BICE provisions falls to the institution claiming the exemption, not the class of investors bringing suit.

Battered by transition risk
The risks to financial advisory practices are directly linked with those of their clients. Once risks have been identified, minimized and eliminated where possible at the advisory level, it’s time to take closer look at the risk embedded at the portfolio level. Among the chief concerns here should be transition risk, which is the risk of transitioning from the accumulation phase of retirement investing to the income phase under unfavorable
Risks have to be identified, minimized and eliminated, where possible, at the advisory level before moving onto clients
market conditions.

For a stark example, think back to October 2008—the height of the financial crisis—when asset classes across the board fell in unison. US equities alone, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, returned -17% for the month. This was a rude awakening for those retiring towards year-end, who encountered much higher transition risk, and consequently much lower portfolio values, than those retiring earlier in the year.

After being battered by transition risk, those 2008 year-end investors then had to contend with drawdown risk, which is essentially the risk of
Index funds heighten both transition risk and drawdown risk with investors at the mercy of the market
outliving one’s retirement savings as account balances dwindle ever downward. Essentially, heightened transition risk leads to heightened drawdown risk as the actual amount to drawdown in retirement may be much lower than anticipated.

In managing client portfolio risks, advisors may believe that passive investments alone are the way to go because their risks are more readily quantifiable and understood by both advisor and client. But this is precisely the kind of thinking that may lead to heighted transition and drawdown risk as the client is at the mercy of the market. The smart alternative here may be active investment portfolios that seek to manage risk just as much as they do return.

Actively managing risk
Managing for return is one thing, and managing risk is quite another. Here are four investment strategies that place equal importance on both for a more holistic approach to market uncertainty:

Options or Tail Risk Hedging PROS

  • Limits downside risk with highest confidence
  • Protects against overnight risks
CONS

  • Expensive approach due to high option premium (depending on underlying)
  • No upside potential


Tactical Asset Allocation PROS

  • Aims to outperform benchmark and deliver alpha in any market
CONS

  • Lower focus on and confidence in risk mitigation
  • Allocations are dependent upon a
    specific model



Dynamic Allocation PROS

  • Provides cost-efficient risk mitigation without options
  • Focus on outperformance in down markers
CONS

  • No hard guarantee for risk protection
  • Incurs tracking error due to deviation from benchmark



Absolute Return Strategies PROS

  • Aims at delivering positive return independent of market and benchmark
  • Possible alpha source
CONS

  • Does not provide beta risk of portfolio
  • Can trail markets in positive market environments





Subscribe Today Dialed In to Retirement is available as a subscription for financial professionals only. New issues will be delivered via email every month. Your email address must be in our records for your subscription to take effect.

The material contains the current opinions of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Statements concerning financial market trends are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and are not intended to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.



Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, 1633 Broadway, New York, NY 10019-7585, us.allianzgi.com, 1-800-926-4456.

Search

> Advanced Search

Find a Product

Or Select

Or Browse by

Contact Us

For all inquiries please contact us

Follow Us

       
Comment on this article

About Dialed In to Retirement

Each month, Dialed In to Retirement offers thoughtful insights from our US head of retirement strategy on ways to improve outcomes for plan participants, including analysis of emerging retirement trends, portfolio construction ideas, regulatory developments and behavioral finance research.

Glenn Dial is Head of Retirement Strategy in the US with Allianz Global Investors, which he joined in 2011. He has 23 years of defined contribution experience. Mr. Dial is a co-inventor of the method and system for evaluating target-date funds, and is also credited with developing the target-date fund category system known as “to vs. through.”
Product Focus 
82487 

Share

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

You are currently leaving us.allianzgi.com and navigating to a third-party website. Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC accepts no responsibility for content on third-party sites or for the services provided. When using the services provided by a third-party site, you are subject to that site’s terms of service and privacy rules, which you should review carefully.