An Unpleasant Taste of Austerity 

Kristina Hooper 

The Upshot 

2/4/2013 

A resilient Wall Street shrugged off last week’s poor GDP numbers, which reflected major defense-spending cuts leading up to the fiscal cliff. Still, it’s a reminder that belt-tightening can be painful, says Kristina Hooper.
Untitled Document Kristina Hooper, CFP®, CIMA®, is US head of investment and client strategies for Allianz Global Investors. She has a B.A. from Wellesley College, a J.D. from Pace Law and an M.B.A. in finance from NYU, where she was a teaching fellow in macroeconomics.

The markets may have found reasons to overlook last week’s bad GDP numbers, but investors shouldn’t ignore how government-spending cuts could take a bite out of the ongoing economic recovery.

Last week’s strong stock-market performance marked the fifth consecutive week of stock-market gains. Driven by positive surprises in new economic data—including strong showings in manufacturing, durable-goods orders and construction spending—the Dow Jones Industrial Average finished over 14,000 and the S&P 500 Index stayed above 1500.

What’s remarkable, however, was the lack of concern about the preliminary reading of fourth-quarter 2012 gross domestic product (GDP)—which showed a dramatically disappointing annualized growth rate of -0.14% versus expectations of 1.2%. That’s right: The numbers show an economic contraction for the quarter.

Digging deeper into the GDP report, we can see several areas of quarter-over-quarter weakness—including a large drawdown in inventories, which is likely to rebound, and a large decrease in federal, state and local government spending:

  • Real federal government consumption expenditures fell 15% in the fourth quarter vs. a 9.5% third-quarter rise.

  • National defense was the biggest detractor; it fell 22.2% in the fourth quarter after jumping 12.9% in the third quarter.

  • Non-defense spending did increase 1.4%, although that was less than half of the third-quarter’s rise of 3.0%.

  • Real state and local government consumption expenditures and gross investment decreased 0.7% in the fourth quarter, compared with a third-quarter hike of 0.3%.

The GDP contraction was likely overlooked because it largely reflected defense-spending cuts that took effect as the nation approached the “fiscal cliff.” In fact, during the fourth quarter, military spending on everything but personnel reportedly fell at the sharpest rate since the end of the Vietnam War. Some of this enormous plunge could actually be due to a shift in defense spending from the fourth quarter to the third, when we saw an increase of 12.9%.

Still, overall, the fourth-quarter GDP decline is a cautionary tale about the risks of fiscal tightening—in particular, what a big decrease in government spending in the near future could mean for the economy.

Belt-Tightening Bar Graph


Government-spending cuts can take a toll on employment, too—as seen in the most recent jobs data. January non-farm payrolls showed a net creation of 157,000 jobs; 166,000 private-sector jobs were added in January but 9,000 public-sector jobs were lost.

This is actually the continuation of a near-four-year trend that has decreased only in severity: The average number of public-sector jobs lost per month in 2012 was 6,000 compared to 26,000 in 2011. Clearly, more private-sector jobs must be created to make up for public-sector losses—which is easier said than done. Although building a more fiscally sound government is a good thing, getting there can be painful.

At the same time, there is an overall positive economic picture that shouldn’t be overshadowed by the economy’s vulnerability to potential fiscal tightening. There was certainly some good news in the most recent GDP report; consumer spending was healthy, as was business investment in new equipment and software. What’s more, the employment report also contained some bright spots, including a substantial upward revision in total non-farm payroll employment for the previous two months. Last week’s robust ISM Manufacturing Index’s reading was also positively surprising. Clearly, the underlying dynamics of the US economy are much better than the GDP headline figure indicates.

Subscribe Today The Upshot is available as a subscription for financial professionals only. New issues will be delivered via email every Monday. Your email address must be in our records for your subscription to take effect.



The material contains the current opinions of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Statements concerning financial market trends are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and are not intended to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.

 
Past performance of the markets is no guarantee of future results. This is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is presented only to provide information on investment strategies and opportunities.


A Word About Risk
: Equities have tended to be volatile, involve risk to principal and, unlike bonds, do not offer a fixed rate of return. Foreign markets may be more volatile, less liquid, less transparent and subject to less oversight, and values may fluctuate with currency exchange rates; these risks may be greater in emerging markets.
 
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the value of all final goods and services produced in a specific country. It is the broadest measure of economic activity and the principal indicator of economic performance.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is a price-weighted average of 30 actively traded blue chip stocks, primarily industrials, but including financials and other service-oriented companies. The components, which change from time to time, represent between 15% and 20% of the market value of NYSE stocks.

The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing Index is a composite diffusion index of national manufacturing conditions. Readings above 50 percent indicate an expanding factory sector.

Unless otherwise noted, index returns reflect the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gains, if any, but do not reflect fees, brokerage commissions or other expenses of investing. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, 1633 Broadway, New York NY, 10019-7585, us.allianzgi.com, 1-800-926-4456.

Search

> Advanced Search

Find a Product

Or Select

Contact Us

For all inquiries please contact us

Follow Us

       

Related Documents

TypeTitle
The Upshot - 02.04.13 
Investor
The Upshot 
AGI-2013-02-04-5880 

Share

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

You are currently leaving www.alliazinvestors.com and navigating to a third-party website. Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC accepts no responsibility for content on third-party sites or for the services provided. When using the services provided by a third-party site, you are subject to that site’s terms of service and privacy rules, which you should review carefully.