Divided Fed Keeps Pouring the Punch 

Kristina Hooper 

The Upshot 

5/28/2013 

The latest FOMC minutes juiced concern among investors that the Fed will curtail its asset purchases. But the Fed is unlikely to change its accommodative ways in the near term, writes Kristina Hooper.
Twitter

Get The Upshot
first on Twitter!

Follow AllianzGI_US on Twitter

Join the Conversation!

Kristina Hooper, CFP®, CAIA, CIMA®, ChFC® is US head of investment and client strategies for Allianz Global Investors. She has a B.A. from Wellesley College, a J.D. from Pace Law and an M.B.A. in finance from NYU, where she was a teaching fellow in macroeconomics.

The hawks are circling but the doves still rule the roost.

Despite growing sentiment at the Fed that its asset-purchase program should be unwound, it seems unlikely it will change any time soon. But the market showed its disdain for any such tapering of asset purchases last week. It was yet another sign markets and monetary policy are highly correlated.

High Correlation


Low Correlation


Indeed, it was a big week for the Fed and investors: The FOMC minutes were released and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testified before Congress. Investors focused on the possibility of the Fed's asset purchases slowing down in the near term, which shook markets. Not only did the S&P 500 Index fall, but also the 10-year Treasury yield moved above 2%.

The minutes suggest that FOMC members have increasingly divergent views on quantitative easing. Some members said that it has produced "positive results for the economy" and even pointed to the Bank of Japan's recent monetary policy shift as further proof of QE's stimulative impact. Other members are growing more concerned about the risks of creating future financial imbalances and higher inflation.

June Swoon?

Despite the fact the Fed remains committed to its highly accommodative stance, investors reacted negatively to the committee's debate. That's because there's growing sentiment among some Fed members that the asset purchase plan needs to be curtailed: A number of participants suggested scaling back purchases as early as June if the economy shows evidence of "sufficiently strong and sustained growth." The notion of a proposed paring of asset purchases rattled investors. While the committee ultimately concluded that it was "prepared to increase or reduce the pace of its purchases" to adjust to changes in the outlook for employment or inflation, the timing of its eventual exit was left unresolved.

Even the Japanese are worried about the Fed pulling away stimulus soon. Thursday's sell-off in the Nikkei was at least partly due to those concerns. But it doesn't seem like the Fed is ready to taper off its asset-purchase plan. In testimony last Wednesday, Bernanke seemed to assure the Joint Economic Committee of Congress that the Fed is unlikely to slow its stimulus program any time soon, as it could threaten the economic recovery: "A premature tightening of monetary policy could lead interest rates to rise temporarily but would also carry a substantial risk of slowing or ending the economic recovery and causing inflation to fall further."

It's clear that a number of FOMC members are worried about the negative impact that taking away the punch bowl sooner will have on the somewhat fragile—definitely uneven—economic recovery, especially given the headwinds of sequestration. Some members view the sequester and tax hikes as constraints to aggregate demand, although to varying degrees.

Turning Japanese?

Perhaps more telling was a recent speech by New York Federal Reserve Bank President William Dudley, which detailed the history of Japan's monetary policy over the past two decades and observed that, "Fiscal policy…reversed abruptly on several occasions before economic recovery was firmly established." Japan's struggle is a lesson not lost on US central bankers, who are clearly more focused on ensuring a sustainable recovery than they are on controlling inflation, particularly since inflation appears to be a waning concern.

In fact, Dudley drew an analogy between Japan's attempts to stimulate its economy more than a decade ago and America's recent efforts: "Our policies also had a ‘start-stop' aspect to them that may have undercut their effectiveness. For example, until September 2012, our large-scale asset programs generally specified the total size of the program, with a purchase rate and an expected ending date. This created a void when the programs ended and made our policy response sporadic and hard to forecast. This limited the scope for market prices to adjust in anticipation of our future actions in ways that would help stabilize the economy."

Bernanke is focused on providing as much transparency as possible, but that much transparency also causes confusion as to what actions the Fed will take. So despite a growing chorus of FOMC members interested in reducing asset purchases sooner rather than later, they may be outnumbered by the doves—like Bernanke, Yellen and Dudley—who are unlikely to permit a tapering of asset purchases until they're convinced the economy is in full-on recovery mode.

For their part, investors should be less concerned about a near-term reduction in asset purchases. Rather, they should be prepared for the volatility that could be created by confusion over the Fed's strategy.

Subscribe Today The Upshot is available as a subscription for financial professionals only. New issues will be delivered via email every Monday. Your email address must be in our records for your subscription to take effect.




 
Past performance of the markets is no guarantee of future results. This is not an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is presented only to provide information on investment strategies and opportunities.


A Word About Risk
: Equities have tended to be volatile, involve risk to principal and, unlike bonds, do not offer a fixed rate of return. Foreign markets may be more volatile, less liquid, less transparent and subject to less oversight, and values may fluctuate with currency exchange rates; these risks may be greater in emerging markets.
 
The material contains the current opinions of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Statements concerning financial market trends are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and are not intended to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.

 

Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, 1633 Broadway, New York NY, 10019-7585, us.allianzgi.com, 1-800-926-4456.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index (S&P 500) is an unmanaged index that is generally representative of the U.S. stock market.

Unless otherwise noted, index returns reflect the reinvestment of income dividends and capital gains, if any, but do not reflect fees, brokerage commissions or other expenses of investing. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Search

> Advanced Search

Find a Product

Or Select

Contact Us

For all inquiries please contact us

Follow Us

       

Related Documents

TypeTitle
The Upshot-05.28.13 
Investor
The Upshot 
AGI-2013-05-28-6969 

Share

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

You are currently leaving us.allianzgi.com and navigating to a third-party website. Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC accepts no responsibility for content on third-party sites or for the services provided. When using the services provided by a third-party site, you are subject to that site’s terms of service and privacy rules, which you should review carefully.