Share Tool

Minorities No More  

 

Immigration Reform and Its Political Realities 

7/29/2013 

 

Older white voters are aging and falling as a percentage of the electorate. Republican leaders, including former President George W. Bush and his brother, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, recognize this reality. They believe that the party must respond or face never winning the presidency again. Complicating their challenge is the fact that Republican political strength is concentrated in the House of Representatives, whose constituents live primarily in rural and suburban areas. However, minority voters are heavily concentrated in densely populated urban areas. The average GOP congressional district is 75% white, up 2% since 2010. Meanwhile, the average Democratic district is only 51% white, down 1% since 2010. For a lot of Republican members of Congress, allowing a pathway to citizenship through immigration reform could have an adverse effect on their personal careers, even though it could be better for the national Republican Party.

Republican districts have also become less ideologically diverse. The Cook Political report, a widely respected non-partisan publication, says that of the 234 Republican seats in the House, 186 of them are considered “safe” compared to 148 seats 20 years ago. During the same period of time, the average Republican congressional district increased from seven percentage points more Republican than the national average to 12%. According to a May 1 Pew Research Center survey on immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship, 52% of Republican voters polled oppose amnesty while 27% support it. In contrast, 60% of Democratic voters polled support amnesty, while 18% oppose it.

So it’s not surprising that the average House Republican sees little incentive to vote for immigration reform. In fact, House Republicans who do so face the political consequences of going against more conservative members of their party. The easiest thing for them to do is avoid a major immigration reform altogether. The preferred platform for most House Republicans is to demand border security first and facilitate immigration for highly skilled workers second. At the same time, they want to delay any further action until the border is secure. This course of action would benefit House Republicans but it’s less appealing for Republican senators, who are elected at large.

Revealing this divide between the House and Senate, roughly one-third of Republican senators, led by John McCain (R-Ariz.), voted for the immigration reform bill that passed in the Senate by a surprising 68-32 vote on June 27. To secure their votes, and the votes of a few wavering Democrats, Democratic leadership conceded to a proposal to increase border security by $39 billion and added an amendment to allow the hiring of 20,000 new border-security agents, new fencing, electronic surveillance and drones.

   
Immigration Reform and Its Political Realities
Immigration Reform on the Radar
Minorities No More
What's Next?
   


The material contains the current opinions of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Statements concerning financial market trends are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. References to specific securities and issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Forecasts and estimates have certain inherent limitations, and are not intended to be relied upon as advice or interpreted as a recommendation.

 

Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC, 1633 Broadway, New York NY, 10019-7585, us.allianzgi.com, 1-800-926-4456.

Search

> Advanced Search

Contact Us

For all inquiries please contact us

Follow Us

       
Investment Themes 
AGI-2013-07-29-7490 

Share

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter

You are currently leaving us.allianzgi.com and navigating to a third-party website. Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC accepts no responsibility for content on third-party sites or for the services provided. When using the services provided by a third-party site, you are subject to that site’s terms of service and privacy rules, which you should review carefully.